In this post I will simply give you a chance to see a video of a young girl describes her experience of motherhood. Like millions of women around the world. But she is special because it is a lesbian and decided together with his partner to have children. Already. Just unlucky this girl :))
- Women. And we still know how women are mistreated by a world too often a human scale.
- Lesbian. Want to put a minority in the class already difficult woman?
- Mum. Heck, a minority within a minority in a category considered to be minor. And above all, a minority view, and often poorly evaluated negatively by the same people who do not put homosexuals ALTR * homosexuals have children.
Meet the story of Simon. If you leave me a comment with calm and after seeing the movie in its entirety below.
Two data (Source Eurispes of June 2009) to conclude this post.
- Dry NO adoption of children by homosexual couples. Regarding the possibility 'for a homosexual couple to adopt a baby, only a minority were in favor: 19%, less than one in five Italian; compared with 69.1% of opposites.
The proportion of advocates and is 'also decreased by eight percentage points compared to 2003 (27%), indicating a return of the public positions of more' conservative.
- More favorable to women, the North-East of Italy, the youngest and most educated and those on the left.
21.8% of women believe that a stable homosexual couple is entitled to adopt a child, compared with 16.2% of males. The percentage decreases in favor of the age all'innalzarsi ': 28.8% among 18-24 age group, 22.8% among 25-34enni, 17.7% among 35-44enni, 19.3% between 45 -64enni, only 6.1% among the over 65. I support the adoption of children by homosexuals are numerous especially in the North-East (26.9%) and North-West (21.4%), less the South (12.8%) and Islands (13 %). The favorable increase, however, all'innalzarsi of the qualification, in fact, passing from 5.2% of subjects without title or with an elementary school, 11, 4% of those with secondary school, 19.2% of graduates up to 24% of graduates. 38.5% of those who declare that the left believes that gay couples should have the opportunity 'to access adoption, followed by 21.9% of those center-left, from 13.5% of those in the center, to drop to 7.7% of center-right and to 2.7% of those on the right. There is still a long way to go and people still ask to serve the Gay Pride? On 'omogenitorialità has just released a book that I recommend with pleasure, easy to read but not superficial, rich food for thought is no comparison. It's called "Good Parents" by Chiara Lalli and if you want you can also buy it online here
WANT TO KNOW WHAT ARE THE FEED?
Click here!
_____________________________________
ONLINE COURSE GUIDELINES APA
Buy It Now! What are you waiting?
_____________________________________
But the dogma from which derives the certainty that there is no right to be parents? If it is the technical possibility of medicine to cure infertility has groped a woman's right to become a mother, which means having a baby. As is also the child's right to be born in the mile possible conditions, including that of not being ill, select the embryo does not mean a person selected on the basis of its genetic characteristics, but selects the envelope that this person will have a Once born, and as if one can prevent diseases and accidents, though one can also avoid pressing me to bring children with genetic problems.
No problem to cure 'infertility, as in' men as in women, but here the case of manufacturing a test tube baby, is all a 'else. You, if I were reborn, would you rather be manufactured in a test tube or considered in the 'womb of your mother?
As for the selection of embryos ... I'll quietly note that you have ideas worryingly close to those of the Nazis, who, in fact, plenty of practicing the 'Eugenics ... see you a little ...
The right of children is to be loved, respected and cared for, regardless of sex or sexual orientation of those who generate them or grow them.
And all the scientific studies (which of course you ignore) show that the sexual orientation of parents (or whoever takes care of) NO has no influence on the mental health of children, nor about their sexual orientation.
How dare you judge what she feels for her children Simon, coming to say that it is only desire for motherhood and love?
On the question of whether you prefer to be designed (not building!) In a test tube or not I really do not see big difference compared to birth in a womb. I think it is more important as I am fed, loved, and grew up mostly accepted.
The first human right is to be designed in accordance with the laws of nature. E'diritto man 's not being generated as if it were a cow, straight man' s not to be manipulated, selected, rejected, as if he had killed a person. Law of 'man be born even if it does not meet the parameters chosen by others. 'S right man to have a dad and a mom, because that mother nature has provided.
I have not ever dreamed of judging the feelings of Simona for their children, I only pointed out that the impetus that led Simon to become a mother was just the desire to have children. The desire, not the 'love, (in any case impossible to people who do not exist), Simon has moved to seek motherhood. Desire, once again, perfectly legitimate and normal in a young woman ... just ... is a desire, not a right.
Nobody has the right to design and build (from a genetic point of view-bilogico) my life in a laboratory. I have a right to be conceived according to nature.
The rhetoric of the fallacy of hitlerium to work with who has the dirty pathy. and whether to select an embryo that my son will be without genetic diseases is eugenics, then I support eugenics.
Greetings!
Cabbage ... of your children.
There are no vested rights of individuals. The "right to have a child" means, in fact, entitled to a child, to welcome a child when the child arrives ... ... second nature. Only in this case one can speak of law.
The "right to have a child" can not mean the right to possess a son, as if it were a thing. Having a child can not even claim to mean, buy, request, order, making a tube ... figlio.Non are no rights of parents over children. However, there are rights of children, not the parents, but to be born according to nature, to grow in the presence of two figures of parent (mother and father) set by nature (not the church ... the bully!), To recognize the mother (for females) or father (for boys) ... these are the only rights, and those of their children, not those of the parents.
The rights we will have children (who are weak in quessta each other), not the parents.
Parents, as such, have no rights, only duties are: it's called love ... this word mean anything? Love! Not one mentioned by Simon, which is only desire for children (only natural in a woman, but ... question of desire, not of law, let alone love!). Think about ...
children are entitled to grow in a healthy, balanced where not to miss love and affection. These rights do not depend on parents' genitals, but on their head and their heart. The heterosexual parents are not perfect example of a couple, as there are families that do not guarantee rights and responsibilities over their children. Moreover, a lesbian woman can still get pregnant even having intercourse with a man, as a straight couple can have children in the test tube, or better with assisted reproduction. At one time it was inconceivable to think of the extended family, are now almost as common family type. This should make us realize that there is no perfect model for every place and every time, the family, as the company is something that evolves and changes with changes in their company and the different needs of mankind. Every day we do things "unnatural" such as telephone, dressing, driving, etc.. Yet do not we deem inappropriate.