Women, lesbian, mom ... just unlucky:)
In this post I just want to give you the chance to see a video of a young girl describes her experience of motherhood. Like millions of women around the world. But she is special because it is a lesbian and decided together with his partner to have children. Yeah. Just unlucky this girl:))
- Woman. And we still know how women are mistreated by a world too often on a human scale.
- A lesbian. Want to put a minority in the class already difficult woman?
- Mom. Heck, a minority within a minority in a category considered to be minor. And above all, a minority view, and often poorly evaluated negatively by the same people who do not agree that homosexuals ALTR * homosexuals have children.
Meet the story of Simon. If you want to leave a comment after watching calmly and in whole the movie below.
Two data (Source Eurispes of June 2009) to conclude this post.
- Dry NO adoption of children by homosexual couples. With regard to the possibility 'for a homosexual couple to adopt a baby, only a minority argues in favor: 19%, less than one in five Italian, compared with 69.1% against.
The proportion of advocates and is 'also decreased by eight percentage points compared to 2003 (27%), indicating a return of the public positions of more' conservative.
- Women are more favorable, the North-East of Italy, the youngest and most educated and those on the left.
21.8% of women believe that a stable lesbian couple is entitled to adopt a child, compared with 16.2% of males. The percentage decreases to raising the age of favorable ': 28.8% among 18-24-year old, 22.8% among 25-34-year old, 17.7% among 35-44 year old, 19.3% between 45 -64enni, only 6.1% among the over65. Those in favor of the adoption of children by homosexuals are numerous especially in the North-East (26.9%) and North-West (21.4%), less the South (12.8%) and the Islands (13 %). The favorable increase, however, increasing the degree, in fact, passing from 5.2% of subjects without title or with an elementary school, 11, 4% of those with secondary school, 19.2% of graduates up to 24% of graduates. 38.5% of those who declare themselves to the left believes that gay couples should have the opportunity 'to access adoption, followed by 21.9% of the center-left, from 13.5% of the center, to drop to 7.7% of center-right and to 2.7% of those on the right. There is still a long way to go and people still ask to serve the Gay Pride? On 'omogenitorialità has just released a book that I recommend with pleasure, easy to read but not superficial, rich food for thought is no comparison. It's called "Good Parents" by Chiara Lalli and if you want you can also buy it online here
WANT TO KNOW WHAT ARE THE FEED?
Click here!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ONLINE COURSE GUIDELINES APA
Buy now! What are you waiting?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
This post has 8 comments
February 5th, 2010
But the dogma from which derives the certainty that there is no right to be parents? If it is the technical possibility of medicine to cure infertility is groped a woman's right to become a mother, which means having a baby. As is also the child's right to be born in miles possible conditions, including that of not being ill, select the embryo does not mean a person selected on the basis of its genetic characteristics, but select the envelope that this person will have a Once born, and as if one can avoid the diseases and accidents, even if one can avoid pressing me to bring children with genetic problems.
February 6th, 2010
No problem to cure the 'infertility, especially in' the man in the woman, but here concerned to produce a test tube baby, is all a 'else. You, if I were reborn, would you rather be manufactured in a test tube or considered in the 'womb of your mother?
As for the selection of embryos ... I'll quietly note that you have ideas worryingly close to those of the Nazis, who, in fact, thoroughly practiced the 'Eugenics ... you see a little bit ...
February 7th, 2010
The right of children is to be loved, respected and cared for, regardless of gender or sexual orientation of those who generate them or grow them.
And all the scientific studies (which obviously you do not know) show that the sexual orientation of parents (or whoever takes care of) has no influence on the mental health of children, or their sexual orientation.
How dare you judge what she feels for her children Simon, coming to say that it is only desire for motherhood and love?
On the question of whether you prefer to be designed (not building!) In a test tube or not I really do not see big difference compared to the birth in a womb. I think it's more important how I am fed, loved, raised, and above all accepted.
February 7th, 2010
The first human right is to be designed according to the laws of nature. E'diritto of 'no man be generated as if it were a cow,' s right man to be manipulated, selected, rejected, as if he had killed himself. 'S right man be born even if it does not meet the parameters chosen by others. 'S right man to have a dad and a mom, because that mother nature has provided.
I have not ever dreamed of judging the feelings of Simona for their children, I only pointed out that the impetus that led Simon to become a mother was just the desire to have children. The desire, not the 'love, (in any case impossible to people who do not exist), Simon has moved to seek motherhood. Desire, once again, perfectly legitimate and normal in a young woman ... just ... is a desire, not a right.
No one has the right to design and build (from a biologically-genetic point of view) my life in a laboratory. I have a right to be conceived according to nature.
February 7th, 2010
The rhetoric of the fallacy of hitlerium to work with who has the dirty pathy. and whether to select an embryo for genetic diseases will be without my son is eugenics, then I support eugenics.
February 10th, 2010
Greetings!
Cabbage ... of your children.
January 31st, 2010
There are no vested rights of people. The "right to have a child" means, in fact, entitled to a child, to welcome a child when the child arrives ... ... second nature. Only in this case one can speak of law.
The "right to have a child" can not mean the right to have a child, as if it were one thing. Having a child can not even claim to mean, buy, ask, order, making a tube ... figlio.Non there are rights of parents over children. However, there are rights of children, not the parents, but to be born according to nature, to grow in the presence of two types of parent (mother and father) established by nature (not the church ... that arrogant!), To recognize the mother (for females) or father (for boys) ... these are the only rights, and those of their children, not those of the parents.
The rights we will have children (who are weak in quessta each other), not the parents.
Parents, as such, have no rights, only duties are: it's called love ... this word mean anything? Love! Not one mentioned by Simon, which is only desire for children (only natural in a woman, but ... question of desire, not of law, let alone love!). Think about ...
December 28th, 2011
children are entitled to grow in a healthy, balanced, where love and affection must not be missed. These rights do not depend on parents' genitals, but by their head and their heart. The example of heterosexual parents are not perfect pair, as there are families that do not guarantee rights and duties on their children. In addition, a lesbian woman can still get pregnant even having intercourse with a man, as a heterosexual couple can produce children in the test tube, or better with assisted reproduction. At one time it was inconceivable to think of the extended family, are now almost more common type of family. This should make us understand that there is no perfect model for every place and every time, the family, as the company is something that evolves and changes with their changes in society and the different needs of mankind. Every day we do things "unnatural" as phone calls, dressing, driving, etc.. Yet we do not inappropriate.