Even this endless diatribe. In the wake of the article that I posted about the history of homosexuality therapies I decided to focus attention (mine and yours) on this particular subject.

Freedom

And 'possible to change sexual orientation through psychotherapy?

The NARTH says yes. The 'APA, on the contrary, states that it is necessary to distinguish between sexual orientation (homosexual) identity and sexual orientation (literally, in Italian homosexual identity is better).

We say that 'sexual orientation is the biological response to a genre or both. The report presented at the recent convention of the APA states that, given the current state of the studies, it is recommended to psychotherapists inform their clients that therapy can not change their sexual orientation.
In contrast, the 'identity and sexual orientation (eg. As I call) can be modified by various factors, such as religious meditation.

This is the key point of debate between those who support reparative therapy (or Soče Efforts to Change Sexual Orientation ) and claims to have "cured" many homosexuals and those who argues the opposite. The confusion arose from the mixing elements of homosexual identity (thoughts, sexual acts) with sexual orientation (sexual attraction and affection towards their own sex).

The Soče damage or benefits?

Even in this case two opposing ideas.

The NARTH claims that may be harmful to some people but not for most people who have benefited.
The 'APA claims that existing studies do not allow to reach definite conclusions. At the same time we have known that the benefits in cases in which psychotherapy promotes consistency with the religious beliefs of clients ( or organismic congruence Telic ).

The religious beliefs, along with a rigid personality, are decisive in the choice of a gay identity or his refusal (also applies to women), often leading to a feeling of discomfort, loneliness and depression for whom it is addressed to a psychotherapist asking to "become" heterosexual.

Probably if the thrust conformist sexual stigma and pressure was reduced, thanks to information campaigns anti-homophobic, if you would introduce the correct information about homosexuality in schools and fought prejudice and ignorance, the number of people who have homosexual person experiences his situation as negative and painful, would decrease drastically.

That 's what the APA says focusing on the model of minority stress as head of the many difficulties faced by non-heterosexuals. What the NARTH disclaims absolutely.

What do you think?

I think that religion, for religious people, occupies a prominent place in their lives and it is impossible and not recommended to exclude all or a determined counter values ​​as important. It would only be harmful to the person.

However, I think it is important for any psychologist or psychotherapist, able to separate their individual values ​​and aims of psychotherapy, with the sole intent of helping our customers be more calm and confident, stimulating their inner resources and pushing for an integration of religious values ​​(the customer) and your true self, even though homosexual.

I agree totally with what the APA has expressed in his report "Resolution on Appropriate Responses to Sexual Orientation affirmative Stress and Change Efforts" and I've summarized here:
1) To inform its customers that you can not change their sexual orientation through any type of psychotherapy.
2) To warn parents and families of sexual orientation treatments that portray homosexuality as a mental illness or developmental disorder, encouraging research on psychotherapy and / or social and educational support services that provide accurate information about sexuality and orientation sex, increasing family support and education for children.

But what do YOU think?

WANT TO KNOW WHAT ARE THE FEED?
Click here!
_____________________________________

ONLINE COURSE GUIDELINES APA
Buy It Now! What are you waiting?
_____________________________________


Related Articles